Regarding the development prospects of the STRK project, it currently seems to face numerous challenges. The stability of the project team is in question, as it is reported that two of the three co-founders have already left. On the technical level, STRK has failed to achieve compatibility with zkevm, which means that applications in the Ethereum ecosystem may find it difficult to migrate seamlessly to the STRK platform. This technical limitation could put STRK at a disadvantage in competition, even less favorable than some smaller market capitalization public chains that support EVM.

In terms of ecological development, STRK seems to be trapped in a difficult predicament. The lack of strong financial support makes it hard for the project to attract developers and users, thereby hindering the formation of a healthy ecosystem. In this situation, the project team may face two tough choices: either continue selling tokens to maintain operations or face funding depletion and be forced to terminate the project.

This situation is concerning, as the continued sale of tokens may further depress the token price, and a lack of financial support could lead to development stagnation. For STRK, finding a balance between technological innovation, team building, and financial management will be a key factor in determining its future fate.

Despite the current grim situation, the development history of the blockchain industry tells us that technological innovation and strategic adjustments can sometimes turn the tide. If the STRK project can timely adjust its strategy, there may still be an opportunity to regain market confidence. However, this requires the project team to demonstrate strong execution and innovation capabilities, as well as continuous support from the community.